In an oral order, the Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application as withdrawn with liberty to move the Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39156 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2014 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul
======================================================
KALYANI DEVI
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bilash Roy Raman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 27-06-2019
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move before the learned Sessions Judge for anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. It is made clear that if the petitioner files bail application before the learned Sessions Judge, the same will be decided on its own merit by the learned Sessions Judge.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
sanjeev/-
U T
Kalyani Devi
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
