In Criminal Misc. No.38091 of 2019, the Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail. The Court rejected the submission regarding false implication and noted the gravity of the offences complained of.
The anticipatory bail petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38091 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-220 Year-2018 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul
======================================================
Sanjay De @ Sanjay Kumar Dev, Male age about 49 years Son of Late Din Bandhu De @ Din Bandhu Pa Dev Resident of Village - Tetrahi (ward no.02), P.S.- Pipra, Distt - Supaul.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 26-06-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38091 of 2019(2) dt.26-06-2019 2/2
which has been sustained on her chest with sharp weapon.
(Vikash Jain, J)
BT/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail ought to be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in criminal proceedings alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code.
Whether the absence of an injury report despite the informant claiming injury precludes the grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay De @ Sanjay Kumar Dev
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
