This order dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner arrested under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC for alleged fraud in government fund withdrawal. The court refused bail due to the gravity of the offence and lack of immediate apprehension of arrest.
Anticipatory bail petition dismissed; no relief granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36811 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2015 Thana- EKANGARSARAI District- Nalanda
======================================================
VIJAY KUMAR Son of Kali Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Dattu Bigha, P.S. - Aungari, Dist.- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shyamal Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 17-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36811 of 2019(2) dt.17-06-2019 2/2
apprehension of arrest, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a fraud case regarding government funds.
Whether the petition satisfies the nexus requirement between the apprehended arrest and the FIR allegations.
Whether the delay in approaching the court affects the grant of anticipatory bail.
Vijay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
