Dismissed

Raj Kishore @ Raj Kishore Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Sept 2019CR. MISC./32235/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No.32235 of 2019, this Court entertained a bail application in a murder case. The petitioner claimed false implication and lack of complicity, but the State opposed citing support for prosecution by witnesses. The Court dismissed the plea as not a fit case for bail. Outcome: Bail rejected.

What did the court decide?

Bail to the petitioner is rejected.

Raj Kishore @ Raj Kishore Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32235 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-294 Year-2018 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJ KISHORE @ RAJ KISHORE RAM Son of Vishwanath Ram @ Bishwanath Ram Resident of Village-Raghunathpur Tola-Bhalua, P.S.Raghunathpur, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 12-09-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

¶11

State.

¶12

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 294 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 307, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report. During investigation also, nothing has come showing complicity of this petitioner in the alleged crime. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 02.03.2019.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32235 of 2019(4) dt.12-09-2019 2/2

¶15

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State submits that petitioner is named accused in the first information report. Petitioner is the person who had asked the informant to come to the place of occurrence where he was fired upon. During investigation, witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

¶16

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.

¶17

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶18

mcv/-

¶19

U T

Raj Kishore @ Raj Kishore Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kishore @ Raj Kishore Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Tanik @ Radhe Shyam @ Radhe Shyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Das Vs the State of Bihar

Bihari Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar