Allowed

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC8 May 2019CR. MISC./3222/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court affirmed the provisional bail granted to a petitioner accused of offences under Sections 498A and 323 IPC in a domestic cruelty case, noting the petitioner's readiness to provide dignity and care to the complainant.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail already granted to the petitioner on 24.01.2019 was affirmed and the application was allowed.

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav Vs The State of Bihar and Anr. — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3222 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2017 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav son of Shivalak Yadav Resident of VillageKanypur, P.S.- Rahui, District - Nalanda

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar and Anr Bihar

¶8

Laxmi Devi Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav Resident of Village- Kanaypur, P.S.-Rahui, District - Nalanda at present daughter of Umesh Rai, Resident of Village- Paithanichak, P.S.- Pandarak, District - Patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.142 (C) of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of subjecting his wife (O.P.No.2) with cruelty and he tried to kill her with respect to demand of motorcycle and golden chain.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the court below he has stated that he is ready to keep her and still he is ready to keep her with dignity and care and it

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3222 of 2019(6) dt.08-05-2019 2/2

¶16

appears from perusal of the record that earlier the notice was issued to the O.P.no.2 which has been received by the mother of the O.P.no.2 and a petition for jointness has also been filed by the petitioner, however, in spite of that O.P.no.2 has not appeared.

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

In such view of the matter, let the provisional bail already granted to the petitioner, vide order dated 24.1.2019 passed in the instant case, in connection with Complaint Case No.142(C) of 2017 is affirmed.

¶19

With the aforesaid direction, this application is

¶20

allowed.

¶21

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶22

chn/-

¶23

U T

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramshila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Mohan Mishra Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Rupesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Binay Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kushwaha @ Mukesh Kumar Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Nabab Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.