Allowed

Deepak Thandar @ Deepak Kumar Thandar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2019CR. MISC./31794/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 941 of 2018. The court ordered their release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and subject to various conditions including physical presence in court. The order is based on Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under conditions of physical presence and cooperation with investigation.

Deepak Thandar @ Deepak Kumar Thandar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31794 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-941 Year-2018 Thana- FORBESGANJ DistrictAraria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DEEPAK THANDAR @ DEEPAK KUMAR THANDAR Son of Jai Prakash Thandar Resident of Village- Amhara Ward No. 12, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

¶5

Bipin Mandal Son of Ashok Mandal Resident of Village- Kamta Ward No. 6 P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

¶6

Durganand Bishwas Son of Late Ganesh Bishwas Resident of VillageRangdaha, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

¶7

Krishna @ Kishan Mandal Son of Tej Narayan Mandal Resident of Village- Baijnathpur, P.S.- Simraha, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

¶8

Sheela Devi Wife of Jai Prakash Thandar Resident of Village- Amhara Ward No. 12, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

¶9

Bandana Devi Wife of Om Prakash Thandar Resident of Village- Amhara, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 08-08-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶17

APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 307, 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 941 of 2018.

¶19

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31794 of 2019(3) dt.08-08-2019 2/3

¶21

implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. No specific overt act whatsoever of assault has been alleged against the petitioners who are merely said to be the members of the mob. Statement is made at the Bar that the prior cases in which the petitioners are accused have been lodged at the instance of the informant’s side.

¶22

Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the informant appears and has been heard.

¶23

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners’ arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 941 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶24

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶25

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶26

(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31794 of 2019(3) dt.08-08-2019 3/3

¶28

shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶29

(iv) That the petitioner nos. 5 and 6 shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned Court to be physically present and petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall remain physically present in court on each and every date, and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶30

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶31

Ibrar//-

¶32

U T

Deepak Thandar @ Deepak Kumar Thandar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Thandar @ Deepak Kumar Thandar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prahlad Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Subhas Rai Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sushil Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Anandi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bhuneshwar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Rai @ Sanjeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar