In this oral order, the Patna High Court dismissed the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail regarding a criminal case involving alleged assault and grievous hurt arising from a land dispute.
The petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed. The petitioners remain apprehend arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31685 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2019 Thana- THARTHARI District- Nalanda
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Mrs. Babita Kumari, Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP For the Informant : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
4 09-08-2019
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31685 of 2019(4) dt.09-08-2019 2/2
(Vikash Jain, J)
BT/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners who apprehend arrest for alleged offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satyendra Gope, Mahesh Gope, Upendra Gope
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
