Allowed

Vijay Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jun 2019CR. MISC./30828/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, ordering his release upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Special Judge, Excise, Gaya.

Vijay Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30828 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2019 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIJAY CHOUDHARY, aged about 27 years (Male), Son of Vilash Choudhary, Village - Dhab Rampur, P.S.- Sherghati, District – Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr.Nityanand, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 28-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

counsel for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 16.02.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 85 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

¶16

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 85 liters wine is recovered. Out of which, 50 liters wine is said to have been recovered from

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30828 of 2019(3) dt.28-06-2019 2/2

¶18

possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 96/2019.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

U.K./-

¶23

U T

Vijay Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khushbu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Jha @ Vikash Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Uttam Kumar Shahi @ Golu Kumar Shahi Vs The State of Bihar

Niranjan @ Ram Laddu @ Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Vs the State of Bihar

Lalchand Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Paswan @ Baba Vs The State of Bihar