This oral order dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Md. Arif. The court held that the three-year delay in filing, compared to the 2014 FIR, indicated no immediate apprehension of arrest.
Anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30691 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2014 Thana- POTHIYA DistrictKishanganj
======================================================
MD. ARIF, aged about 35 years, male, Son of Md. Tahir Resident of Village - Rahatpur, P.S.- Dalkhola, District- Uttar Dinajpur (West Bengal)
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 05-08-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30691 of 2019(3) dt.05-08-2019 2/2
F.I.R., this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail shall be granted to the petitioner who filed the petition five years after the FIR without showing immediate apprehension of arrest.
Md. Arif
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
