has disclosed that she had not been kidnapped by the petitioner no. 1, though the fact of the matter is that both, petitioner no. 1 and victim girl, have entered into a marriage alliance and referring to para-8 of the application, learned counsel submits that out of their wedlock, petitioner no. 1 and victim girl have children and they are happily living in the State of Punjab, where petitioner no. 1 is employed. Learned counsel referring to a compromise petition entered into between petitioner no. 1 and the victim girl, which is Annexure-2 dated 21.12.2018, submits that both parties have compromised their differences and a joint application has been filed for compromise before the court of learned Sessions Judge, Supaul. Learned counsel submits that though anticipatory bail of the petitioners was earlier rejected by the court below in 2013, but due to subsequent development, which has taken place by virtue of a compromise petition in the year 2018, a second application for anticipatory bail was filed by the petitioners which has been dismissed by the court below without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 2 is also one of the family members of the petitioner no. 1.
