Allowed

Subhash Thakur @ Anup Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 May 2019CR. MISC./30252/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving serious offences including waging war, murder, and conspiracy. The court noted the petitioner was in custody since 2018 and no overt acts were alleged against him. Bail was allowed subject to fees and conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount who must be close relatives, subject to conditions.

Subhash Thakur @ Anup Thakur Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30252 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2013 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUBHASH THAKUR @ ANUP THAKUR Son of Ram Swarup Thakur Resident of Village - Pakare, P.S.- Kothi, Distt - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 08-05-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in Imamganj P.S. Case No. 63 of 2013 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 121(A), 124(A), 307, 353, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3, 4, 5 of Explosive Act and Section 17 of C.L.A. Act.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that name of this petitioner has been taken by the informant merely on suspicion.

¶16

It is alleged in the written report that Police team recovered several articles near forest as mentioned in the written report. The informant has raised suspicion against petitioner, other 15 named accused and 100-150 unknown persons.

¶17

Petitioner is in custody since 16.7.2018.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30252 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2

¶19

Keeping in view the period spent by the petitioner in custody and no overt act alleged against him, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of G.N. Dubey, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Sherghati, Distt. Gaya, in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 63 of 2013, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶21

S.Ali/-

¶22

U T

Subhash Thakur @ Anup Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash Thakur @ Anup Thakur v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Westlink Trading Private Limited Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Om Singh Vs State through the Union of India ( C. B. I. )

Manoj Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bibi Jahana @ Jahana Khatoon @ Jahana Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar