The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving theft, releasing him on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 subject to specific conditions and statutory provisions.
Petitioner released on bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29640 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2018 Thana- AGIAON District- Bhojpur
======================================================
MITHILESH KUMAR RAI @ MITHILESH RAI Son of Kapur Chand Rai Resident of Village- Nausatar, P.S.- Bihiya, District- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dinesh Singh,APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 09-05-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29640 of 2019(2) dt.09-05-2019 2/2
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on anticipatory bail apprehending arrest.
Whether the condition of anticipatory bail is appropriate given the alleged baseless implication of the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mithilesh Kumar Rai @ Mithilesh Rai
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
