Petitioner sought bail in a criminal case involving forgery, cheating, and IT Act offences. The High Court granted bail on the condition of furnishing a bail bond and two sureties.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28906 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-408 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya
======================================================
Buntty Kumar @CHAKARPANNI @ Bunty Kumar Chakrapani Son of Sri Dinesh Singh Resident of Village - Maksudpur, P.S.- Khizersarai, DistrictGaya (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rohit Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 17-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 379, 411 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66(A) of the I.T. Act.
Allegedly, two ATM cards, one of Allahabad bank and the another of Andhra Bank as well as cash amounting to Rs. 40,000/- were recovered from possession of the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 25-12-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The ATM cards and money, recovered from the petitioner, belongs to him. There is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28906 of 2019(4) dt.17-08-2019 2/2
in the present case. Only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rail, Gaya in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 408 of 2018.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail upon furnishing appropriate bonds and sureties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Buntty Kumar @ CHAKARPANNI @ Bunty Kumar Chakrapani
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
