Dismissed

Vinod Mahto v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC4 Jan 2019CR. MISC./28763/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna considered a criminal miscellaneous application petitioning for the quashing of a cognizance order under sections 498A IPC and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner sought to withdraw the application, which was granted with liberty to issue a fresh application before the lower court raising all grievances at the appropriate stage.

What did the court decide?

the application stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty to move before the Court below.

Vinod Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 28763 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of Complaint Case No.-577 Year-2011 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vinod Mahto, Son of Ram Chandra Mahto, resident of Village - Padampur, P.S. - Mashrakh, District - Saran (Chapra).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Leelawati Devi, D/o - Rekhai Mahto, W/o - Vinod Mahto at present r/o Village - Deoria, P.S. - Maharajganj, District - Siwan.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶11

Date : 04-01-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

¶13

The petitioner has moved the Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for the following relief:

¶14

“That this is an application for quashing the order dated 21.10.2011 passed in Complaint Case No. 577/11 by the learned S.D.J.M., Siwan whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken against the petitioner and others for the offences u/s 498 A of the I.P.C. and 4 of the D.P. Act.”

¶15

After some arguments, learned counsel for the

¶16

petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28763 of 2014 dt.04-01-2019 2/2

¶18

application with liberty to move before the Court below at the appropriate stage and raise all his grievances there.

¶19

In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

¶20

If the petitioner files any application before the Court below, at the appropriate stage, raising all points available to him, the same shall be considered and disposed off on merits, in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the present order.

¶21

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶22

P. Kumar

¶23

AFR/NAFR U T

Vinod Mahto v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Mahto v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramchandran Jaiprakash Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Dhananjay Paswan and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Syed Mohammed Ali and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Israil and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Satish Suman Vs The State Of Bihar