Petitioner failed to appear in person. State representative and opposite party II appeared and filed counter affidavit. Criminal Miscellaneous application was dismissed as unopposed due to non-appearance of petitioner.
Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28516 of 2014
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2003 Thana- MUNGER COMPLAINT CASE District- Munger
======================================================
Roshan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar Singh Son of Nityanand Singh, Proprietor of M/s. Roshan Kumar Store Works Mahamda Munger Resident of Village - Garhi Rampu, P.S. - Naya Ram Nagar, District - Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL ORDER
3 02-01-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned
A.P.P. for the State is present. He has also filed counter affidavit
on behalf of opposite party no. 2.
In the aforesaid background, the application stands
dismissed.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
P. Kumar
U T
Roshan Kumar @ Roshan Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
The Factory Inspector, Munger
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
