Dismissed
Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./26322/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26322 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2018 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani
======================================================
AJAY YADAV Son of Lakshman Yadav, Resident of Village-Rahikpur, P.S.Babubarhi, District-Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Malay Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA
ORAL ORDER
7 14-08-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Babubarhi P.S. case no. 37 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the IPC.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 1.10.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 53473 of 2018 with liberty to renew prayer for bail after six months if no substantial progress is made in the case.
Petitioner is in custody since 2.4.2018.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that charge has
been famed in this case on 14.6.2019 as per his instruction.
Petitioner is husband of deceased.
The prayer for bail petitioner was earlier rejected on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26322 of 2019(7) dt.14-08-2019 2/2
merit by this Court therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer for bail of the petitioner again rejected.
Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of 9 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and send compliance report.
Petitioner may renew his prayer for bail in the event trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period.
(Sanjay Priya, J)
shyambihari/-
U T
Ajay Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sanjay Priya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court