Allowed

Suresh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jul 2019CR. MISC./25626/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On a pet. aap for anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR under IPC Sections 272, 273 and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Section 30(A), learned J. Arvind Srivastava deemed the case fit for bail and directed release within four weeks of arrest or surrender upon furnishing a security bond to the excise judge.

What did the court decide?

Directed release of the petitioners on bail upon arrest/surrender within four weeks upon furnishing bail bond with sureties.

Suresh Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25626 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2018 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SURESH RAM S/O, Late Chaturi Ram, Resident of Village- Bhalohiya, P.S.- Mejorgun, District- Sitamarhi.

¶5

Manoj Ram, Son of Late Ganesh Ram, Resident of Village- Khairwa, P.S.Mejorgun, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 10-07-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Mejorgunj P.S. Case No. 458 of 2018 registered under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. On the basis of the confessional statement of one Raju Singh, the names of the petitioners have been transpired in the present case. Further submission is that it is evident from the F.I.R. itself, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25626 of 2019(3) dt.10-07-2019 2/2

¶17

of this petitioner. The alleged vehicle does not belong to the petitioners.

¶18

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.D.J.-II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Mejorgunj P.S. Case No. 458 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶19

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶20

shailendra/-

¶21

U T

Suresh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karan @ Karan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Keyash Bin @ Kyash Bin Vs The State of Bihar

Gaurav Srivastava Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishekh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sarita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Ravidas @ Bablu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar