Allowed

Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 May 2019CR. MISC./23675/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought bail in a case under Section 379 IPC. The court granted bail upon the completion of six months of custody. The petitioner must furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon completion of six months in custody, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23675 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2017 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ritesh Kumar Son of Sri Sukhal Singh @ Brij Kumar singh Resident of Village - Bhagwatipur, P.s.- Udwant nagar, Distt.- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Bachan Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 14-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The prosecution case in brief is that motorcycle of the informant, parked at Bihari Mill, was found missing.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 20-12-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The petitioner had no knowledge that the motorcycle, in question is a stolen property. It has further been submitted that the petitioner may be released after completion of six months in custody.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23675 of 2019(3) dt.14-05-2019 2/2

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner

¶19

is named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that after completion of six months in custody , the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ara in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 510 of 2017.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

A.K.V.//-

Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Priyanka Kumari @ Dolly Kumari Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Imroz @ Shamim Akhtar @ Md. Shamim Akhtar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhote Kumar Rai @ Chhote Kumar Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Sohan Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Janam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar