The High Court at Patna dismissed an application against an impugned order dated 21.12.2013 for non-prosecution, as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the specified date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22543 of 2015
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1083 Year-2013 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kr. Rakesh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Accordingly, this application filed against the order
dated 21.12.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Tr. No. 4924 of 2014 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1083 of 2013 is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Kundan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application against an impugned order should be allowed for non-prosecution when petitioners do not appear?
Sumitra Devi
Megh Nath Sharma
The State of Bihar
Sharmila Devi
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
