In Cr. Misc. No. 22238 of 2019, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing arrest for murder and causing death for injured consent under the Indian Penal Code in a case filed in Siwan District.
Release on anticipatory bail via bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22238 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2018 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan
======================================================
Rahul Kumar Bhagat @ Rahul Kumar (Male, aged about 23 years) Son of Ratan Kumar Bhagat, Resident of Village-Markan, P.S-Hussainganj, DistrictSiwan.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 19-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22238 of 2019(3) dt.19-07-2019 2/2
and two other persons have been named.
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J)
BT/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail in apprehension of arrest for offences under Sections 302 and 201/34 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Kumar Bhagat
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
