This single-judge High Court oral order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the US 2017 FIR. He was charged with offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 498A. Justice Vi
Released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 plus two sureties of like amount with four specific conditions before CJM Muzaffarpur.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20881 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-949 Year-2017 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
GOPAL SAHNI, aged about 50 years, male, S/o Narayan Sahni, Resident of Village- Rohua Apuchh, P.S.- Mushahari, Dist- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
4 16-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20881 of 2019(4) dt.16-07-2019 2/2
08.12.2017 for the alleged occurrence of 18.07.17 and onwards. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail pending trial in the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 498(A) IPC.
Whether strict conditions should be imposed on the petitioner for granting bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gopal Sahni
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
