Allowed

Anil Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2019CR. MISC./20652/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition connected to a case of robbery under Section 395 IPC, the High Court granted bail to the petitioner. The order was predicated on his lack of criminal antecedents, the fact he was not named in the FIR, and that he had not undergone Thumb Print Identification for features.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Anil Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20652 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2018 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANIL SAH Son of Late Mahendra Sah, Resident of Mohalla-Aliganj, Gangti, Police Station-Babarganj, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 03-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶12

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Mojahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 255 of 2018 for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code later on converted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that initially F.I.R was lodged against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits it is alleged that informant saw the face of the miscreants and can also identify the miscreants. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is 40 years old and he was apprehended by the police on 06.12.2018 but petitioner has not been put on

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20652 of 2019(2) dt.03-04-2019 2/2

¶15

T.I.P for his identification.

¶16

Considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and petitioner was not named in the F.I.R. and petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. for establishing his identification, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let, the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Mojahidpur ( Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 255 of 2018.

¶17

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶18

T.Kr./-

¶19

U T

Anil Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bibi Salma Khatoon Vs Md. Mushahid Raza and Ors.

Sima Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar

Rama Shankar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Arun Kumar Presently Posted As Commissioner, Irrigation, Bihar Sichai Bh

Prakash Roshan @ Bullet Srivastava Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Imtiyaz Vs The State of Bihar