Allowed

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jun 2019CR. MISC./19938/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a murder case where investigation was complete, no eyewitness existed, and the petitioner was not named in the FIR, subject to conditions including residence and cooperation with the trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions of residence and cooperation.

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit @ Raju Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19938 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2018 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit @ Raju Son of Kaushal Kishore Singh @ Dharmendra Rai Resident of Village- Dumra, P.S.- Belsand, District- Sitamarhi at present resident of Mohalla- Tarachak, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs.Usha Kumari Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 04-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act.

¶12

There is no eye witness of the occurrence of murder of son of the informant, however, 11 person are named in the FIR, suspected to be involved in the occurrence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Investigation of the case is already complete.

¶13

Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19938 of 2019(3) dt.04-06-2019 2/2

¶15

like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Rupaspur Police Station Case No.332 of 2018, subject to the condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below having immovable property and further the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶16

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶17

Nitesh/-

¶18

U T

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar @ Sumit @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Budhan Yadav and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Suresh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Choudhary @ Rajendra Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar @ Ranga Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Dayanand Sutihar @ Adyanand Sutihar @ Asia Sutihar Vs the State of Bihar

Bijendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar