The Patna High Court, in Criminal Miscellaneous No.1851 of 2019, rejected a petition challenging an order arising from a police case. The bench held there were no cogent grounds for interference and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1851 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2018 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Ramji Prasad Singh Late Ram Awadh Singh Resident of Village + P.O.Gotpa, P.S.- Bikramganj, District - Rohtas at present village-Mishrawaliya, P.S.- Karakat, Distrrict-Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 01-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned A.P.P.
There happens to be no cogent ground to interfere
with the order impugned.
Petition is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any cogent ground to interfere with the judicial-magistrate's order impugned.
Ramji Prasad Singh Late Ram Awadh Singh
The State of Bihar
Raushan Kumar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
