Allowed

Ajeet Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2019CR. MISC./17106/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants bail to the petitioner, accused in a dowry-death case under Sections 304(B) and 34 IPC. The court allowed release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Siwan.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vth, Siwan.

Ajeet Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17106 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2018 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajeet Sah Son of Birendra Sah Resident of Village - Gaur, Uttar Tola, P.S.Maharaj Ganj, District - Siwan

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Akhileshwar Kumar Shrivastva For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 01-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioner caused death of the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has relied upon the statements of the witnesses made in paragraphs 4, 5, 9 and 20 of the case diary, in which it has been stated that the deceased is alleged to have

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17106 of 2019(3) dt.01-07-2019 2/2

¶17

committed suicide. No offence under Section 304(B) of I.P.C. is made out. At best, it is a case for an offence under Section 306 of I.P.C.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Vth, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. case No.167 of 2018.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Ajeet Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan @ Ram Laddu @ Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Vs the State of Bihar

Lalchand Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Paswan @ Baba Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Shyam Mahto @ Shyam Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Ram @ Ajay Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar