Allowed

Bikrama Rai and Ors. v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Mar 2019CR. MISC./16879/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to five petitioners accused of offences under various sections of the IPC. The High Court directed release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and adherence to specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties and complying with specified conditions.

Bikrama Rai and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16879 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-274 Year-2018 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bikrama Rai , Male, aged 60 years, Son of Late Ram Janam Rai

¶5

Updesh Rai, Male, aged about 32 years,

¶6

Sugriv Rai, Male, aged about 40 years,

¶7

Chhote Rai Male, aged about 26 years, All three sons of Bikrama Rai

¶8

Ramanand Rai , Male, aged about 40 years, Son of Late Rudal Rai All resident of Village - Radhiya, P.S.-Maharajganj, District - Siwan

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr.Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 26-03-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP

¶17

for the State.

¶18

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 34 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 274 of 2018.

¶19

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute between children of the respective sides in which both sides have received injuries. It is submitted that no specific accusation of assault has been attributed to petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4. The accusation of assault with farsa on the head of the informant by petitioner no. 2 is not supported by the injury report showing lacerated wound which is simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

¶20

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners’ arrest

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16879 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2

¶22

or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Siwan in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 274 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions --

¶23

(i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives.

¶24

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶25

(iii) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶26

(iv) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

BT/-

¶28

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶29

U T

Bikrama Rai and Ors. v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bikrama Rai and Ors. v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bablu Shani @ Brij Bhushan Shani Vs The State of Bihar

Devanand Yadav @ Devanand Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ramayan Patel and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Nisha Kumari Vs the State of Bihar through Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Muzffarpur

Belal Ansari @ Md.Belal Ansari and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.