Allowed

Anwar Hussain v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Mar 2019CR. MISC./16292/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants provisional anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of cheating and criminal conspiracy under IPC sections, subject to repayment of an outstanding gold loan to the State Bank of India in equal monthly installments and strict compliance with court appearances.

What did the court decide?

Granted provisional anticipatory bail subject to repayment of outstanding bank loan in eight monthly installments starting April 30, 2019.

Anwar Hussain Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16292 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN District-

¶3

Gopalganj

¶4

======================================================

¶5

ANWAR HUSSAIN Son of Wajid Hussain, Resident of Village - and P.S.Uchkagaon, Distt.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Rashid Alam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State Bank of India and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 406/420/467/468/471/120(B)/34 IPC registered in connection with Gopalganj (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 257 of 2018.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation that he has obtained gold loan from the State Bank of India (SBI) against gold deposited by the petitioner after valuation by the Bank’s valuer, but the gold was found to be of lower purity upon re-valuation. It is alleged that the petitioner had acted in connivance with the Bank’s valuer for the higher valuation of the gold. In any event, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner expresses his willingness to repay the outstanding amounts of the bank against the loan taken by them.

¶14

Learned APP assisted by learned counsel for the SBI appear and have been heard. It is submitted on behalf of the bank that an amount of Rs. 8,22,190/- is outstanding against the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16292 of 2019(2) dt.25-03-2019 2/3

¶16

petitioner in respect of two gold loan accounts.

¶17

Be that it may, in the event of petitioner arrest or surrender within four weeks hereof let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- [ten thousand] each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj (Nagar) P.S. Case No. 257/2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶18

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶19

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶22

The provisional bail shall be confirmed upon verification that the total amount outstanding against the petitioner up-to-date together with interest thereon is repaid by the petitioner, after granting credit for any amount if any, paid by him subsequently, in eight equal monthly instalments, the first of which shall be paid by 30th of April, 2019 and the remaining instalments by the end of each succeeding month, and also subject to issuance of no dues certificates by the bank to the petitioner.

¶23

If the petitioner fails to pay two consecutive

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16292 of 2019(2) dt.25-03-2019 3/3

¶25

instalments as stipulated above, the provisional bail shall automatically stand cancelled.

¶26

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶27

Chandran/-

¶28

U T

Anwar Hussain v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar Hussain v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Tanti @ Tantan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Mojahid @ Mujahid and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anjan Kumar Singh @ Anjani Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Shani @ Brij Bhushan Shani Vs The State of Bihar

Devanand Yadav @ Devanand Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Rai Vs the State of Bihar