Allowed

Gopalji Pathak v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC20 Aug 2019CR. MISC./15994/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted the petitioner anticipatory bail upon his assurance to live with the wife and children at the matrimonial home, withdraw the child custody petition filed elsewhere, and refrain from torture. Bail is granted subject to conditions and the furnishing of a bond with sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks.

Gopalji Pathak Vs the State of Bihar and Anr. — Domestic Violence | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15994 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GOPALJI PATHAK S/o Late Ramakant Pathak Resident of Village- Raiganj Mandi Akabarabad, District- Gogipur (Shahri) Uttar Pradesh.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶8

Guriya Pathak W/o Gopalji Pathak, D/o Sona Mishra Resident at VillageRaiganj Mandi Akabarpabad, District- Gogipur (Shahri), U.P. at present rendent of Mishra tola Jail Road Ara, P.S.- Ara, District- Bhojpur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajendra Nath Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Zainul Abedin For O. P. No. 2 : Mr. Shiva Shankar Pd. Singh ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 20-08-2019 Pursuant to the order, dated 03.07.2019, the

¶13

petitioner and the Opposite Party No. 2 are present in person along with their respective Counsel.

¶14

Both, the petitioner as well as the Opposite Party No. 2, are ready to live as husband and wife and the petitioner has undertaken to allow the Opposite Party No. 2 to live with him in her matrimonial home with care and dignity along with her two children.

¶15

The Opposite Party No. 2 has informed that the petitioner has filed a case for the custody of his children, aged about 10 years and 09 years respectively before the Ghaziabad Court. She apprehends that when the Opposite Party No. 2 will

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15994 of 2019(6) dt.20-08-2019 2/3

¶17

start living with her husband at her matrimonial home, the petitioner will oust her and will forcibly keep the children with him. Upon this, the petitioner has undertaken that he will not pursue the case before the Ghaziabad Court for custody of the children and will withdraw the same within a period of one month from today.

¶18

The petitioner further assures that he will keep his wife and children with all love and care and will never torture Opposite Party No. 2, as alleged by her in the First Information Report.

¶19

The petitioner submits that he will visit his sasural tomorrow (21.08.2019) in order to fetch his wife-Opposite Party No. 2 from her parent’s house.

¶20

In view of the undertaken given today by the petitioner and the fact that Opposite Party No. 2 is also willing to go and live with the petitioner along with her children at her matrimonial home, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶21

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶22

Let the petitioner, Gopalji Pathak, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15994 of 2019(6) dt.20-08-2019 3/3

¶24

10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ara, in connection with Ara Mahila Police Station Case No. 126 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶26

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶27

U √ T √

Gopalji Pathak v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopalji Pathak v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Paswan @ Gunjan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Tirthnath Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Basant Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jaylal Rai @ Jailal Rai Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Kailash Gupta and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar

Shila Kumari Vs The State of Bihar