Dismissed

Sheo Narayan Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2019CR. MISC./15120/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Patna rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by a Ward Member accused of fraudulent withdrawal of funds using forged signatures. The court directed the petitioner to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail. Quality: thin.

What did the court decide?

Application for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioner directed to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail.

Sheo Narayan Paswan Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15120 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2018 Thana- KASMA District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SHEO NARAYAN PASWAN Son of Ramvilash Paswan Resident of Village - Mubarakpur, P.S. - Kasma, District - Aurangabad (Bihar)

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 25-06-2019

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kasma Police Station Case No. 82 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation against the petitioner, as per the First Information Report, is that the petitioner is the Ward Member of Ward No. 9, who, on the basis of forged signature, has withdrawn a sum of Rs. 2,40,000/- from the bank fraudulently, by putting the signature of Vidhi Chand Paswan, who is the Secretary of the Managing Committee.

¶15

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has completed the work upto 1000 feet and has falsely been implicated in this case inasmuch as there is no proof that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15120 of 2019(5) dt.25-06-2019 2/2

¶17

the petitioner has put the signature of Vidhichand Paswan on the cheque.

¶18

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that in paragraph 41 of the case diary, the complicity of he petitioner in the offence has come to light.

¶19

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶20

This application for anticipatory bail, is hereby, rejected.

¶21

The petitioner, Sheo Narayan Paswan, is directed to surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered by the learned Court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶23

Prabhakar Anand/-

Sheo Narayan Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheo Narayan Paswan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Mita Devi Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Nilmani Tudu Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Md. Shaukat, Vs the State of Bihar

Raushan @ Raushan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Roy @ Sanjeev Kumar Ray Vs the State of Bihar