Allowed

Parimal Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC6 Mar 2019CR. MISC./13808/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving Section 138 NI Act and Section 420 IPC. The petitioner was directed to refund the amount through an undertaking, and the court fixed a period within which he must surrender for bail release.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of similar amount, upon satisfying the learned court below within thirty days of receipt of the order.

Parimal Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13808 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2018 Thana- MUNGER COMPLAINT CASE District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Parimal Kumar (Male) aged about 50 years, S/o Shri Nandan Singh Resident of - Reena Electronics, Bakarganj Gola Road, Near Patna Academy, P.S.Pirbahore, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Nishant Kumar (Male) aged about 35 years, Son of Sri Kaushal Kishore Kumar R/O-Vill.-Farda Purbi Tola P.S.-Naya Ramnagar District-Munger

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Zainul Abedin,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-03-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and 138 N.I.Act.

¶15

Cheque of Rs.Two Lacs issued by the petitioner in favour of the complainant allegedly bounced. Petitioner is ready to refund the aforesaid amount. Petitioner is ready to refund 25% of the same before filing of the bail bond through cheque. Thereafter, the remaining amount shall be refunded in six monthly installments.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13808 of 2019(2) dt.06-03-2019 2/2

¶17

Considering the aforesaid undertaking, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No.177(c) of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further the non-fulfillment of the aforesaid undertaking by the petitioner would be a ground for cancellation of the bail bond by the learned court below itself.

¶18

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶19

Nitesh/-

¶20

U T

Parimal Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parimal Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Shekhar Singh and Ors. Vs Amarnath Mishra and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs M/s Sadanand Singh Construction Works

Pawan Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Kanhai Kumar @ Kanhai Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Prasad Choudhary Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Madhu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar