Oral order dismissing an application as withdrawn due to petitioner's arrest; no substantive legal principle established.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13368 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2018 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad
======================================================
AMRITESH KUMAR SINGH, Son of Ramdeep Singh, Resident of VillageHathiyara, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
4 01-05-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this application stating that petitioner has been arrested during the pendency of this application.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
spal/-
U T
Amritesh Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
