Allowed

Kanhaiya Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2019CR. MISC./13298/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, who was in custody for offences under the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act. The petitioner undertook to cooperate with the investigation, surrender for appearance, and furnish a bail bond with blood relatives as sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and conditions regarding presence in court and cooperation with the investigation.

Kanhaiya Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13298 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-486 Year-2018 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kanhaiya Kumar, Son Of Sita Ram Singh, Resident Of Village- Bihat, Tola- Jagir, P.S.- Barauni, Distt.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tarun, Advocate Mr. Saket Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 19-04-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

The petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2018 in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No.486 of 2018, registered for the offence under Sections 399, 402 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR in the present case was registered on the basis of the statement of Police Inspector of FCI, stating that some persons who had assembled at Kunal Line Hotel at N.H.-31 were planning some offence and on the basis of such information the said hotel was raided and 4 persons were arrested, whereas the petitioner is said to be amongst those persons who had run

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13298 of 2019(4) dt.19-04-2019 2/3

¶17

away. It is further submitted that actually the petitioner has no role to play and his name has been subsequently inserted on the basis of the conjectures and surmises as the petitioner is the owner of the Kunal Line Hotel. It is further submitted that the petitioner is having some criminal antecedent but the petitioner undertake to cooperate in the investigation and also to make himself available as and when required during the trial. He is further submitted that one of the co-accused person namely, Manish Kumar who was arrested from the place of occurrence has since been extended the privilege of bail in Cr.Misc. No.23894 of 2019 vide order dated 15.04.2019.

¶18

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Barauni P.S. Case No.486 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:

¶19

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

¶20

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13298 of 2019(4) dt.19-04-2019 3/3

¶23

without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

¶24

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶25

(Anjana Mishra, J)

¶26

Amjad/-

¶27

U T

Kanhaiya Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmu Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Jogi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Mandal Vs the State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar

Rudal Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Khedu Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh @ Sugreev Paswan Vs the State of Bihar