Dismissed

Prashuram Singh @ Prashurma Yadav @ Prashuram Yadav @ Parshuram Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 May 2019CR. MISC./13030/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, accused of assault and attempted murder with injuries fatal to the victim, sought bail. The court refused bail due to the nature of the accusation involving a dying declaration and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within one year.

What did the court decide?

Bail rejected; Trial Court directed to conclude trial within one year.

Prashuram Singh @ Prashurma Yadav @ Prashuram Yadav @… — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13030 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2017 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRASHURAM SINGH @ PRASHURMA YADAV @ PRASHURAM YADAV @ PARSHURAM SINGH Son of Late Ramadhar Singh resident of village-Daluhan,P.S-Dinara, Distt.-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 10-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶11

APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

¶13

The prosecution case in short is that after taking meal, while the informant was walking, the accused persons, variously armed, came and shot fire at him due to which he sustained injury and later succumbed to the injury.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 5.9.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13030 of 2019(3) dt.10-05-2019 2/2

¶16

submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no substantive evidence to suggest his implication in the present case.

¶17

On behalf of the State and the informant, it is submitted that the F.I.R. is dying declaration of the deceased. As per F.I.R., the petitioner is one of the assailants.

¶18

Considering the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 153/2017. The same is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial preferably within one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶19

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶20

Pankaj/-

¶21

U T

Prashuram Singh @ Prashurma Yadav @ Prashuram Yadav @ Parshuram Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashuram Singh @ Prashurma Yadav @ Prashuram Yadav @ Parshuram Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akash Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Yadav @ Ranjit Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Uma Devi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Suresh Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Lallu Rai @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar