The High Court at Patna dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear in court despite the presence of the prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12126 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2016 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Kunwar Prasad Son of late Kanhaiya Prasad Resident of Village - Bideshi Tola, P.S. - Thawe, District - Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha,APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 09-08-2019 Despite waiting for some time, no one appears on
behalf of the petitioner.
Learned APP is present.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
avin/-
U
Kunwar Prasad
The State Of Bihar
Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Kumar Yadav Danraj Yadav
Raju Yadav Dhanraj Yadav
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
