Allowed

Rahul Kumar @ Putti v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Feb 2019CR. MISC./11109/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral bail order in a criminal case under Sections 414/34 IPC involving interception of a motorcycle and recovery of a mobile phone. The Hon'ble Court granted bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two close relative sureties

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties (close relatives) to Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.

Rahul Kumar @ Putti Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11109 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-658 Year-2018 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAHUL KUMAR @ PUTI, S/o Arvind Kumar Sharma, residing at Park Road, Near Icecream Factory, P.S-Kadamkuan, Dist.-Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satrudhan Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-02-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 658 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

It is alleged in the written report that Police intercepted one Motorcycle without number and petitioner along with co-accused Shahrukh @ Aamir was found sitting on the Motorcycle. It is further alleged that one Mobile phone has been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

¶16

In the seizure list it is mentioned that Motorcycle has been recovered from possession of co-accused Sharukh @ Aamir and on search of petitioner, one Mobile phone has been recovered from his possession.

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11109 of 2019(2) dt.25-02-2019 2/2

¶18

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 16.11.2018 having clean antecedent.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 658 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶21

S.Ali/-

¶22

U T

Rahul Kumar @ Putti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar @ Putti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Yadav @ Pitambar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Shankar Kumar Akela Vs The State Of Bihar

A. K. Sanal Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar (and Ors)

Abhisek Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Chinta Devi Vs The State of Bihar