The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel was permitted to withdraw the appeal as it was barred by limitation, with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail before the Session's Court.
ltr_u_counsel_permitted_withdraw
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.81 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2018 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
In view of the fact that this appeal is barred by limitation, as such learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty to first move before the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Samastipur, for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
Amjad/-
U T
Bindeshwar Singh
Bablu Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
