Allowed

Savita Devi and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2019CR. APP (SJ)/706/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal appeal regarding the rejection of anticipatory bail under the SC/ST Act, the Patna High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The court held that the allegations were general and omnibus in nature, and granted bail to the appellants subject to bond and surety conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; appellants enlarged on bail furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount.

Savita Devi and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.706 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2016 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Savita Devi Wife of Godhan Sao R/o Mohalla- Saidpur Nand Nagar Colony , P.S- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Patna

¶5

Basanti Devi @ Kavita Kumari D/o Godhan Sao R/o Mohalla- Saidpur Nand Nagar Colony , P.S- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Patna

¶6

The State of Bihar. ===============	Versus ========================	... ... Appellants. ... ... Respondent/s ===============
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s	: Mr. Rajiv Nayan
For the Respondent/s ===============	: Mr. Sadanand Paswan ========================	===============

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

6 22-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶10

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the

¶11

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the 'SC/ST Act') against the refusal of prayer of anticipatory bail vide order dated 17.12.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV-cum Special Judge SC/ST Act, Patna in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2016 registered under Sections 302 and 328/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (2) b (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶12

Son of the informant was in love with Basanti Devi @ Kavita Kumari but the family members of Basanti Devi

¶13

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.706 of 2019(6) dt.22-07-2019 2/3

¶14

used to dislike him and due to that reason they called his son to his house through Basanti Devi @ Kavita Kumari and after assaulting him administered him poison. Resultantly his son arriving at his house started vomiting and felt restlessness and succumbed.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Appellants have been falsely implicated in the case because appellant Basanti Devi @ Kavita Kumari has lodged a case being Bahadurpur P.S. Case No.159 of 2016 against the mother and other relatives of the deceased. The deceased was in love with the appellant Basanti Devi @ Kavita Kumari but her family members were not ready for the same as they happen to be of different caste hence the deceased suo motu consumed poison. Earlier the deceased has also consumed poison for the said reason but he was saved at that time. Informant in his statement recorded in para-51 of case diary given to the police on quizzing stated that earlier the deceased had consumed poison but he was saved after treatment. The independent witnesses in para-23, 24 & 25 of the case diary have unanimously stated that the deceased was in love with Basanti Devi @ Kavita Kumari and her family members used to dislike

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.706 of 2019(6) dt.22-07-2019 3/3

¶17

him due to caste factor. Earlier he had taken poison but he was saved. The doctor has not found any injury on the person of the deceased. The allegation levelled against the appellants is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Appellants happen to be lady and have no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

¶19

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named appellants, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV-cum Special Judge SC/ST Act, Patna in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal is allowed.

¶21

Trivedi/-

¶22

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶23

U T

Savita Devi and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Savita Devi and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Yadav @ Kariman Yadav @ Anish Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kundal Singh @ Kundan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mazharul Islam Vs The State of Bihar

Lalbabu Sahni @ Lal Sahni and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Udesh Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar