Single-judge oral order dismissing an appeal due to the absence of all appellants after their bail bonds were cancelled and a non-bailable warrant issued at their end.
Appeal dismissed due to absence of appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.566 of 2002
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kr. Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
7 08-08-2019
Seen the report submitted by the learned lower court wherefrom it is evident that as the bail bond of appellants has already been cancelled vide order dated 03.01.2019 in pursuance thereof, on 21.01.2019, then P.O. has already issued the non bailable warrant.
The present PO did not divulge with regard to any steps having been taken at his end and this happens to be the conduct of the PO.
The PO is warned to be vigilant and further, would procure the presence of the convict in order to remand them to judicial custody for getting the sentence properly executed at
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.566 of 2002(7) dt.08-08-2019 2/2
their end.
As the appellants are absent, this appeal is dismissed in view of the principle laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Surya Baksh Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh: (2014) 14 SCC 222.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be dismissed in the absence of the appellants after the bail bond was cancelled and a non-bailable warrant issued.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Surya Baksh Singh v. State of Uttar PradeshApplied¶24
Surya Baksh Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh: (2014) 14 SCC 222 · Who else cites this
MAHENDRA SAHNI
Sakindra Sahani
Paltu Sahani
Aneru Sahani
Kishori Sahani
Rabindra Sahani
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
