It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant has no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. He has been falsely implicated in the case due to dirty village politics. No motive of the occurrence has been attributed to the appellant. After dining with the appellant, the deceased had left for his house and thereafter appellant has no knowledge about death of the deceased. Doctor conducting the autopsy of the cadaver of the deceased has found only one lacerated muscle deep wound on the lateral aspect of the left eye of the deceased and said injury has not been opined as a cause of death rather doctor sent the viscera of the deceased for its chemical examination and reserved its opinion till receiving of the viscera report. On chemical examination of the viscera of the deceased, no metallic, alkaloidal, glycosidal, pesticidal or volatile poison could be detected in it which rules out the complicity of the appellant in the occurrence. There is no cogent and clinching evidence on record indicating the complicity of the appellant in the occurrence. Appellant has been languishing in custody since 11.09.2018.