Relevancy of the F.I.R. is for corroboration or contradiction. There happens to be the specific disclosure in the written report that the victim was present at the Ganichak house and from there, she was taken away by the accused on the pretext of incantation and during course thereof, she was raped but, in spite of the fact that during examination-in-chief she had shifted herself from Ganichak to Saafipur, her attention has not been drawn up at the end of the accused. That means to say, the inconsistency whatever be remained, remained unfounded on account of own fault of the accused. Further more, during crossexamination of the victim, it is apparent that she has not been cross-examined on the score whether being a major she was a consenting party, she was knowing Ram Babu since before the occurrence, she was not even suggested that as the family members have objected on account thereof, in order to protect herself she joined with them and got this case filed putting wrong and incorrect allegation. From the evidence of other witnesses also that means to say P.W.2, P.W.3 and P.W.4, it is evident that though presence of the appellant at their house happens to be since before the occurrence but, they also not been suggested that the victim was very much friendly with the appellant. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, whether it could be perceived that
