The court observed that the criminal appeal arising from an acquittal judgment relating to serious IPC offences should have been addressed to a Division Bench and directed the office to act accordingly.
Directed the office to address/call for the matter before a Division Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (U/S) No.4 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-1999 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE District- Saharsa
3 06-05-2019
====================================================== RAM RAKSHA SINGH ... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Sanjeev Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Satya Narayan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
... ... Appellant/s
This appeal ought to have been addressed to division bench as, arises out from the judgment of acquittal relating to Section 302, 452, 326/34 of the IPC as is evident from para-15 of the judgment.
Office to act accordingly.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Prakash Narayan U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal ought to be determined by a Division Bench due to its relation to an acquittal involving serious offences under IPC.
RAM RAKSHA SINGH
The State of Bihar
ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
