Partly allowed

The Food Corporation of India v. M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited

Patna HC2 Dec 2019L.P.A/1001/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside a Single Judge order directing refunds to sugar mills. It remanded the matter for fresh hearing because the Union of India failed to respond and legal issues remained undecided. Appeals against the writ order were allowed; others dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions C.W.J.C. Nos. 4438, 4439 of 2009 and 13205 of 2010 remanded to Single Judge for fresh hearing. Appeals against original Single Judge order allowed.

The Food Corporation of India Vs M/s Riga Sugar… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1058 of 2019 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4438 of 2009

¶3

======================================================

¶4

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through its Chairman Cum Managing Director.

¶8

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶9

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

¶10

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur.

¶11

M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited, At and P.O. Riga, District- Sitamarhi, through its President Sri Amar Sharma, Son of Late Major B.R. Sharma.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

with Letters Patent Appeal No. 999 of 2019

¶15

¶16

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13205 of 2010

¶17

======================================================

¶18

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi through the Manager

¶19

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶20

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001

¶21

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District- Office, Muzaffarpur.

¶22

... ... Appellant/s

¶23

Versus

¶24

M/s Sasa Musa Sugar Works Ltd. At and P.O. Sasa Musa, DistrictGopalganj through its Factory Manager, Jamaluddin Son of Late Nehaluddin.

¶25

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

¶26

... ... Respondent/s

¶27

======================================================

¶28

with

¶29

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 2/9

¶30

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1001 of 2019 In

¶31

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4438 of 2009

¶32

======================================================

¶33

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through the Manager.

¶34

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶35

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.

¶36

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office- Muzaffarpur.

¶37

... ... Appellant/s

¶38

Versus

¶39

M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited, At and P.O. Riga, District- Sitamarhi, through its President Shri Amar Sharma, Son of Late Major B.R. Sharma.

¶40

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi- 110001.

¶41

... ... Respondent/s

¶42

======================================================

¶43

with

¶44

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1003 of 2019

¶45

¶46

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4439 of 2009

¶47

======================================================

¶48

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through the Manager.

¶49

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶50

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800 001.

¶51

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office- Muzaffarpur.

¶52

... ... Appellant/s

¶53

Versus

¶54

M/s Vishnu Sugar Mills Limited, P.O. Vishnu Sugar Mills, P.S. and DistrictGopalganj, through its General Manager P.R.S. Panicker.

¶55

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi- 110 001.

¶56

... ... Respondent/s

¶57

======================================================

¶58

with

¶59

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 3/9

¶60

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1048 of 2019

¶61

¶62

CIVIL REVIEW No.493 of 2017

¶63

======================================================

¶64

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through the Manager.

¶65

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶66

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.

¶67

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office- Muzaffarpur.

¶68

... ... Appellant/s

¶69

Versus

¶70

M/s Sasa Musa Sugar Works Ltd. At and P.O. Sasa Musa, DistrictGopalganj through its Factory Manager, Jamaluddin, Son of Late Nehaluddin.

¶71

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi- 110001.

¶72

... ... Respondent/s

¶73

======================================================

¶74

with

¶75

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1049 of 2019 In

¶76

CIVIL REVIEW No.22 of 2018

¶77

======================================================

¶78

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through the Manager.

¶79

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶80

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001.

¶81

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office- Muzaffarpur.

¶82

... ... Appellant/s

¶83

Versus

¶84

M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited, At and P.O. Riga, District Sitamarhi, through its President Shri Amar Sharma, Son of Late Major B.R. Sharma.

¶85

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi- 110001.

¶86

... ... Respondent/s

¶87

======================================================

¶88

with

¶89

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 4/9

¶90

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1052 of 2019 In

¶91

CIVIL REVIEW No.21 of 2018

¶92

======================================================

¶93

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through the Manager.

¶94

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Officer, Patna.

¶95

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna-800001

¶96

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur.

¶97

... ... Appellant/s

¶98

Versus

¶99

M/s Vishnu Sugal Mills Limited, P.O. Vishnu Sugar Mills, P.S. and District-

¶100

Gopalganj, through its General Manager P.R.S. Panicker.

¶101

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi- 110 001.

¶102

... ... Respondent/s

¶103

======================================================

¶104

with

¶105

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1055 of 2019 In

¶106

CIVIL REVIEW No.21 of 2018

¶107

======================================================

¶108

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶109

... ... Appellant/s

¶110

Versus

¶111

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through its Chairman cum Managing Director.

¶112

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶113

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

¶114

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur.

¶115

M/s Vishnu Sugal Mills Ltd., P.O.- Vishnu Sugar Mills, District- Gopalganj, through its General Manager, P.R.S. Panicker.

¶116

... ... Respondent/s

¶117

======================================================

¶118

with

¶119

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1057 of 2019

¶120

======================================================

¶121

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 5/9

¶122

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food And Public Distribution) Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶123

... ... Appellant/s

¶124

Versus

¶125

1. The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi Through its Chairman cum Managing Director.

¶126

The General Manager (Bihar) Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶127

The Senior Regional Manager Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

¶128

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur

¶129

M/s Sasa Musa Sugar Works Ltd, At and P.O. Sasa Musa, DistrictGopalganj, through its Manager Jamaluddin, Son of Late Nehaluddin.

¶130

... ... Respondent/s

¶131

======================================================

¶132

with

¶133

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1059 of 2019 In CIVIL REVIEW No.493 of 2017

¶134

======================================================

¶135

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶136

... ... Appellant/s

¶137

Versus

¶138

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through its Chairman cum Managing Director.

¶139

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶140

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

¶141

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur.

¶142

M/s Sasa Musa Sugar Works Ltd, At and P.O. Sasa Musa, DistrictGopalganj, through its Manager Jamaluddin, Son of Late Nehaluddin.

¶143

... ... Respondent/s

¶144

======================================================

¶145

with

¶146

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1060 of 2019

¶147

¶148

CIVIL REVIEW No.22 of 2018

¶149

======================================================

¶150

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), Ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi

¶151

... ... Appellant/s

¶152

Versus

¶153

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 6/9

¶154

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through its Manager

¶155

The General Manager (Bihar) Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna

¶156

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna

¶157

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur

¶158

M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited, At and P.O.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi, through its Present Sri Amar Sharma, Son of Late Major B.R. Sharma

¶159

... ... Respondent/s

¶160

======================================================

¶161

with

¶162

Letters Patent Appeal No. 1061 of 2019

¶163

¶164

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4439 of 2009

¶165

======================================================

¶166

The Union of India through the Secretary (Food), ministry of Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution), Government of India, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶167

... ... Appellant/s

¶168

Versus

¶169

The Food Corporation of India 16-20, Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi, through its Chairman cum Managing Director.

¶170

The General Manager (Bihar), Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, Patna.

¶171

The Senior Regional Manager, Food Corporation of India, Arunachal Building, Exhibition Road, Patna.

¶172

The Area Manager, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Muzaffarpur.

¶173

M/s Vishnu Sugar Mills Ltd. P.O.- Vishnu Sugar Mills, District- Gopalganj, through its General Manager, P.R.S. Panicker.

¶174

... ... Respondent/s

¶175

======================================================

¶176

Appearance :
(In Letters Patent Appeal No.	1058 of 2019)
For the Appellant/s :	Mr. S. D. Sanjay, Addl. S.G. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, CGC Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, C.G.C. Mrs. Priya Gupta, Advocate
For the F.C.I. :	Mr. P.K.Verma, Sr. Advocate
	Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal, Advocate Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate
For the respondents :	Mr. Y. V. Giri, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashish Giri, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kr. Jha, Advocate
(In Letters Patent Appeal No.	999 of 2019)
For the Appellant/s :	Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma
For the Respondent/s :	Mr.Ashish Giri
(In Letters Patent Appeal No.	1001 of 2019)
For the Appellant/s :	Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma

¶177

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 7/9

¶178

For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ashish Giri (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1003 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ashish Giri (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1048 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ashish Giri (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1049 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ashish Giri (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1052 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ashish Giri (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1055 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Tekriwal (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1057 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Tekriwal (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1059 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Tekriwal (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1060 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Tekriwal (In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1061 of 2019) For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Tekriwal ======================================================

¶179

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶180

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶181

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶182

8 02-12-2019 Relying upon the decision rendered by this Court in L.P.A. 380 of 2002 (Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd., Vs. The Union of India & Ors.) reported in 2008(4) BBCJ 347, the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petitions filed by the writ petitioners-respondents herein directing refund of the money already recovered by the Union of through its instrumentality along with interest at the rate of 10% per annum.

¶183

Having heard learned counsel for the parties. Prima

¶184

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 8/9

¶185

facie, we are in agreement with the learned Addl. Solicitor General that the matters need to be remanded back enabling the appellants herein i.e. Union of India as also such of those respondents, who could not file their response in opposition to the writ petitions to file response.

¶186

The Addl. Solicitor General argues that the writ petitions ought not to have been allowed for they were: (a) speculative in nature, (b) barred by constructive res judicata, (c) fit to be dismissed on account of delay and laches, which fact is seriously objected by Mr. Ashish Giri. (d) Also what is canvassed is as to whether the judgment rendered in Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. (supra) is judgment in personem or rem.

¶187

Without going into the factual aspect and leaving the contentions open, considering the fact that the Union of India could not file its affidavit in response to the writ petitions and the fact that crores of money is involved, as also that the learned Single Judge has not dealt with any one of the legal issues canvassed before this Court, we remit the matter back by setting aside the judgment dated 27.02.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4438 of 2009 (M/S Riga Sugar Company Limited Vs. The Union of India & Ors.)and other analogous writ petitions with the further directions:

¶188

Patna High Court L.P.A No.1058 of 2019(8) dt.02-12-2019 9/9

¶189

(a) Writ petitions bearing C.W.J.C. Nos. 4438 of 2009, 4439 of 2009 and 13205 of 2010 stand revived to the original number and position to be listed before the learned Single Judge on 06.01.2020.

¶190

(b) Union of India as also such of those respondents who have not filed their response or additional response, shall positively do so within a period of two months thereafter. Rejoinder to the same within a period of four weeks. All such issues are left open to be considered and decided in accordance with law.

¶191

The appeals filed against the order of the Writ Court i.e. L.P.A. Nos. 999 of 2019, 1001 of 2019, 1003 of 2019, 1057 of 2019, 1058 of 2019 and 1061 of 2019 are allowed and the appeals filed against the order passed in C. Review petitions i.e. L.P.A. Nos. L.P.A. Nos. 1048 of 2019, 1049 of 2019, 1052 of 2019, 1055 of 2019, 1059 of 2019 and 1060 of 2019 are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶192

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶193

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶194

uday/-

¶195

The Food Corporation of India v. M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Food Corporation of India v. M/s Riga Sugar Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bihar Deed Writers Committee, district committee Bettiah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Babu Choudhary Vs The Chairman, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad

Sri Bipin Bihari Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The Food Corporation Of India Vs M/s Vishnu Sugar Mills Limited

Om Prakash Lal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The Food Corporation of India Vs M/s Vishnu Sugal Mills Limited