Rajindra Gope v. Sri Shyam Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court allowed the appellant's counsel to state that the sole appellant is deceased and his sons are not willing to contest. The appeal was then dismissed as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
Patna High Court SA No.177 of 1991 (29) dt.08-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Second Appeal No. 177 of 1991
| ================= Rajendra Gope |
=== | ========================= .... .... Versus |
========= Appellant/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sri Shyam Lal ================= |
=== | .... .... ========================= |
Respondent/s ========= |
| Appearance : | |||
| For the Appellant/s | : | Mr. Binod Kr. Singh Mr. Kalindra Kr Rai |
|
| For the Respondent/s | : | Mr. Pradeep Kr. Mr. /Miss.Hema Verma Mr. Rajiv Nandan Prasad Mr. Akashdeep |
|
| ================= CORAM: HONOUR ORAL ORDER |
=== ABL |
Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh Mr. Sanjesh Prasad ========================= E MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA K |
========= UMAR |
29 08-01-2018 Sri Binod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant submits that sole appellant is already dead and his sons are not willing to contest this appeal. In the circumstances, he is not pressing this appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed as not
pressed.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajendra Gope
- respondent
Sri Shyam Lal
Coram
Birendra Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court