The court observed that the order dated 26.04.2017 in the Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case was complied with and disposed of the current miscellaneous application accordingly without any substantive discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3823 of 2017
Arising out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7363 of 2016
===========================================================
Dr. Rajendra Pandey, Son of Late Sheo Narayan Pandey, Ram Nagar, Chandwa, P.O.+ P.S.- Nawada, Ara, District- Bhojpur at Ara.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the V.K.S.U. : Mr. Arasind Nath Pandey, Advocate
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 29-08-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State and Veer Kunwar Singh University.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U
Dr. Rajendra Pandey
The State of Bihar
Mr. R.K. Mahajan
Mr. Khalid Mirza
Dr. Syed Mumtazuddin
Mr. Manoj Kumar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
