Petitioner sought review compliance of a writ order regarding encasement of earned leave. Court recorded no appearance by respondents but noted compliance. Application disposed of, leaving encasement challenge open to University authorities.
Application disposed of; petitioner retained right to assail the encasement order before University authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1795 of 2016
Arising Out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19056 of 2015
======================================================
Shanta Kumari Wife of Dr. Bimal Kumar, Resident of Municipality Road, Madhubani, Opposite Electricity Office, Police Station- Madhubani, DistrictMadhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 19-12-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Nobody appears on behalf of the State or L.N. Mithila University (hereinafter referred to as the 'University').
Patna High Court MJC No.1795 of 2016 dt.19-12-2018 2/2
that the order of the writ Court has been complied with.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U
Shanta Kumari
The State of Bihar
Dr. Saket Kushvaha
Dr. Ajit Kumar Singh
Dr. U.L. Thakur
Dr. Prem Kumar Prasad
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
