The High Court dispensed with the need to keep the matter pending. Finding that the order passed in the earlier Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case had already been complied with, the Court disposed of the present petition without further order. The Cooperative Society was noted to not be functional.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1766 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13743 of 2008
======================================================
Krishna Kumar Lall, Son of Late Birendra Kumar Lall, Resident of MohallaGandhi Nagar, Ward No.- 20 of Katihar Municipality, P.S. & District- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prashant Pratap, GP 6
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-12-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties.
2 . The opposite party No. 4 has filed show cause disclosing this fact that at present the Co-operative Societies is not functional nor any Administrator has been appointed. The opposite party No. 4 has also averred in show cause that he has already written to Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies for constitution of Ad hoc Committee in accordance with rules and, similarly, he has also written letter to the District Magistrate, Katihar, for vesting power to file and to deal with the
Patna High Court MJC No.1766 of 2016 dt.19-12-2018 2/2
certificate cases.
3 . Moreover, in course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly concedes this fact that the certificate cases have already been filed but the aforesaid certificate cases are not being disposed of by the concerned authorities.
4 . In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in my view, it is needless to keep this matter pending because the order dated 18.11.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13743 of 2008 appears to have already been complied with and, accordingly, this petition stands disposed of.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
Spd/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 21.12.2018 |
| Transmission Date | 21.12.2018 |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition requires adjudication given that the impugned order appears to have been complied with.
Krnima Kumar Lall
The State of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
