Oral order where the High Court of Judicature at Patna disposed of a contempt application after the petitioner acknowledged compliance with the direction. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1654 of 2017
======================================================
Prabhash Chandra Jha, son of Late Shankar Jha @ Shankar Nath Jha, resident of Village- Tardiha, Post- Baluachak, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey - AAG 15 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
direction and order has been complied with.
In view of the same, contempt application stands disposed
off.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
skm/-
U
Prabhash Chandra Jha
The State of Bihar
Adash Titermare
Sri R.K. Mahajan
Sri Amir Subhani
Sri M.R. Tudu
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
