A single judge oral order where the petitioner sought to withdraw a miscellaneous jurisdiction case, arguing maintainability, which was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1561 of 2017
In
First Appeal No. 45 of 2013
====================================================== Laxmeshwar Jha
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Through Collector, Saharsa & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi Aag - 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
3 25-09-2018 Mr. Shashi Dhar Jha, Advocate, submits that the present application is not maintainable as the order which is subject-matter of the present contempt application has been passed by the Lok Adalat. He thus, seeks to withdraw the present M.J.C. application.
It is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjana Mishra, J)
Saif/-
U
Laxmeshwar Jha
The State of Bihar Through Collector, Saharsa & Ors
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
