In a miscellaneous jurisdiction case, the Patna High Court allowed an application for restoration of a previously dismissed Civil Review to its original file, applying reasons indicated in the application.
MJC application allowed; Civil Review No.375 of 2014 restored to original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1310 of 2016 (4) dt.18-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1310 of 2016
======================================================
The Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Railway & Ors
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Ujaria Devi
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
4 18-06-2018 This M.J.C. application has been filed for restoration of Civil Review No.375 of 2014 which has been dismissed in view of the peremptory order passed by this Court on 29.02.2016.
Keeping in view the reasons indicated in the M.J.C. application and findings, this M.J.C. application is allowed and the Civil Review No.375 of 2014 is restored to its original file.
Sanjeev/-
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the MJC application for restoration of the dismissed Civil Review No.375 of 2014 should be allowed.
Whether the peremptory order dismissing the Civil Review bars restoration of the file.
The Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Railway & Ors
Ujaria Devi
Chief Justice
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
