Petitioner filed miscellaneous application for salary payment for leave period after compliance with previous order. Court disposed off application but directed Respondents to pass reasoned order on petitioner's representation within three weeks regarding payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1260 of 2016
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12919 of 2012
======================================================
Nitya Narayan Choubey, S/o Late Padam Nath Choubey, Resident of Village- Aru, P.S.- Vajirganj, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 31-10-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Bihar
State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Corporation’).
order dated 01.12.2015 passed in CWJC No. 12919 of 2012 has been complied with.
Patna High Court MJC No.1260 of 2016 dt.31-10-2018 2/2
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
sujit/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | |
| Transmission Date |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether salary for leave period remained unpaid as alleged by the petitioner?
Whether the respondent corporation shall pay the petitioner for the leave period?
Nitya Narayan Choubey
Sujata Chaturvedi
Arun Kumar Mishra
Ashok Kumar Singh
Arvind Kumar Choudhary
Pramod Kumar Jha
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
